ASHIF SO AJIM SHAIKH JAHAGIRDAR P P MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APEAL/408/2026

Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030206132026

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

e-Filing Number

28-05-2026

Filing Number

APEAL/5481/2026

Filing Date

28-05-2026

Registration No

APEAL/408/2026

Registration Date

28-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118,181,115,189,351,191,190

Petitioner(s)

ASHIF SO AJIM SHAIKH JAHAGIRDAR P P MORE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

THE POLICE INSPECTOR

KISHOR SO ISHWAR MOTIRAM

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

29-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

29-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted pre-arrest bail to appellant Ashif So Ajim Shaikh Jahagirdar in connection with FIR Crime No.98/2026 involving alleged caste-based abuses and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and BNS 2023. The court found that omnibus allegations of caste-based abuses made collectively cannot attract Atrocities Act offences, thus the statutory bar under Section 18 did not apply. The appellant was released on bail with Rs.15,000 PR and surety bonds, weekly police station attendance, and conditions against evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted pre-arrest bail to appellant Ashif So Ajim Shaikh Jahagirdar in connection with FIR Crime No.98/2026 involving alleged caste-based abuses and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and BNS 2023. The court found that omnibus allegations of caste-based abuses made collectively cannot attract Atrocities Act offences, thus the statutory bar under Section 18 did not apply. The appellant was released on bail with Rs.15,000 PR and surety bonds, weekly police station attendance, and conditions against evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case