ASHIF SO AJIM SHAIKH JAHAGIRDAR P P MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APEAL/408/2026
Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030206132026
e-Filing Number
28-05-2026
Filing Number
APEAL/5481/2026
Filing Date
28-May-2026
Registration No
APEAL/408/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHIF SO AJIM SHAIKH JAHAGIRDAR P P MORE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
-
2.THE POLICE INSPECTOR
-
3.KISHOR SO ISHWAR MOTIRAM
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted pre-arrest bail to appellant Ashif So Ajim Shaikh Jahagirdar in connection with FIR Crime No.98/2026 involving alleged caste-based abuses and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and BNS 2023. The court found that omnibus allegations of caste-based abuses made collectively cannot attract Atrocities Act offences, thus the statutory bar under Section 18 did not apply. The appellant was released on bail with Rs.15,000 PR and surety bonds, weekly police station attendance, and conditions against evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
28-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/408/2026
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted pre-arrest bail to appellant Ashif So Ajim Shaikh Jahagirdar in connection with FIR Crime No.98/2026 involving alleged caste-based abuses and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and BNS 2023. The court found that omnibus allegations of caste-based abuses made collectively cannot attract Atrocities Act offences, thus the statutory bar under Section 18 did not apply. The appellant was released on bail with Rs.15,000 PR and surety bonds, weekly police station attendance, and conditions against evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts