VISHWANATH CHINTAMANI POTDAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/702/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,21,19. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Next hearing 29-May-2026

CNR: HCBM030205912026

Filing Number

WP/5469/2026

Filing Date

28-May-2026

Registration No

WP/702/2026

Registration Date

28-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,21,19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHWANATH CHINTAMANI POTDAR

    Adv. DADPE PRASANNA DILIPRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  3. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KALABURAGI

  5. 5.THE POLICE INSPECTOR

  6. 6.THE POLICE INSPECTOR, ALAND

  7. 7.THE POLICE INSPECTOR, SEDAM

  8. 8.THE POLICE INSPECTOR / CIRCLE INSPECTOR

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents in this criminal writ petition filed by Vishwanath Chintamani Potdar against the State of Maharashtra and others, with the return date fixed for 17.06.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve remaining respondents through alternate modes and must file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 28-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/702/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents in this criminal writ petition filed by Vishwanath Chintamani Potdar against the State of Maharashtra and others, with the return date fixed for 17.06.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve remaining respondents through alternate modes and must file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case