SOPAN VITTHAL KANADE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APPLN/1931/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 389. Disposed: --APPLICATION ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030199822026

Filing Number

APPLN/5143/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1931/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 389

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOPAN VITTHAL KANADE AND OTHERS

    Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E

  2. 2.JALINDAR SOPAN KANADE

  3. 3.SUDAM BABASAHEB GHULE

  4. 4.SHASHIKALA SOPAN KANADE

  5. 5.BHARTI @ SWATI MACHINDRA KARPE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Summary: APPLN/1931/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the criminal application and suspended the sentences of five applicants convicted under IPC sections 324, 341, 504, 143, 148, and 144 (upheld on appeal in May 2026). The court granted relief considering the applicants had been on bail during trial and appeal without misuse, had served considerable sentence time, and two were elderly. The applicants were released on personal recognizance bonds of Rs.15,000 each pending final hearing of the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: APPLN/1931/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the criminal application and suspended the sentences of five applicants convicted under IPC sections 324, 341, 504, 143, 148, and 144 (upheld on appeal in May 2026). The court granted relief considering the applicants had been on bail during trial and appeal without misuse, had served considerable sentence time, and two were elderly. The applicants were released on personal recognizance bonds of Rs.15,000 each pending final hearing of the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case