KRISHNA GANGARAM GADEKAR DIED THRU LRS SAKHUBAI YADAV AUTI AND OTHERS vs AMBADAS SHIVRAM AUTI Advocate - Palodkar Devdatt P. — WP/5155/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030197882018
Next Hearing
20th November 2019
Filing Number
WP/15505/2018
Filing Date
05-06-2018
Registration No
WP/5155/2019
Registration Date
29-04-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNA GANGARAM GADEKAR DIED THRU LRS SAKHUBAI YADAV AUTI AND OTHERS
Adv. BEDRE VINAYAK SUDHAKAR
Respondent(s)
AMBADAS SHIVRAM AUTI Advocate - Palodkar Devdatt P.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
NOTIFICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-11-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 23-04-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 38 of 2008 had already been decided. Since the original suit was already adjudicated, no relief could be granted through the writ petition, rendering it devoid of any surviving matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 38 of 2008 had already been decided. Since the original suit was already adjudicated, no relief could be granted through the writ petition, rendering it devoid of any surviving matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts