THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, JAYWANT SUGAR FACTORY LTD., DHAWARWADI THR ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RANJIT.. vs BIBI W/O. YASIN BAGWAN AND ORS. — CA/5506/2026

Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030190312026

Filing Number

CA/14188/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CA/5506/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, JAYWANT SUGAR FACTORY LTD., DHAWARWADI THR ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RANJIT..

    Adv. Dhorde Vikram R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIBI W/O. YASIN BAGWAN AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/5506/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) stayed the trial court's judgment awarding compensation to the claimants on a conditional basis. Although Jaywant Sugar Factory had deposited the principal compensation amount of ₹7,36,680, the court stayed the judgment pending deposit of accrued interest within six weeks. The trial court had found the deceased was employed by the factory and entitled the claimants to compensation despite the applicant's arguments that no employer-employee relationship was established and death resulted from a heart attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5506/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/5506/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) stayed the trial court's judgment awarding compensation to the claimants on a conditional basis. Although Jaywant Sugar Factory had deposited the principal compensation amount of ₹7,36,680, the court stayed the judgment pending deposit of accrued interest within six weeks. The trial court had found the deceased was employed by the factory and entitled the claimants to compensation despite the applicant's arguments that no employer-employee relationship was established and death resulted from a heart attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case