RAJENDRA RAGHUNATH GIRME AND ANOTHER S D KULKARNI vs LAXMIBAI KARBHARI RAUT DIED THR LRS SAKHAHARI K RAUT DIED AND ORS — CA/5835/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030188972026
Filing Number
CA/14069/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
CA/5835/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA RAGHUNATH GIRME AND ANOTHER S D KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAXMIBAI KARBHARI RAUT DIED THR LRS SAKHAHARI K RAUT DIED AND ORS
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF
Case Summary: CA/5835/2026 On June 17, 2026, the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard Civil Application No. 5835 of 2026 involving petitioners Rajendra Raghunath Girme and S.D. Kulkarni against respondents including the legal representatives of deceased Laxmibai Karbhari Raut. The court accepted the applicants' counsel's undertaking to take necessary steps regarding Civil Application No. 5152 of 2023 and noted that respondent No. 1-a's name was wrongly shown as his legal representatives are already on record. The case was adjourned to July 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5835/2026
Case Summary: CA/5835/2026 On June 17, 2026, the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard Civil Application No. 5835 of 2026 involving petitioners Rajendra Raghunath Girme and S.D. Kulkarni against respondents including the legal representatives of deceased Laxmibai Karbhari Raut. The court accepted the applicants' counsel's undertaking to take necessary steps regarding Civil Application No. 5152 of 2023 and noted that respondent No. 1-a's name was wrongly shown as his legal representatives are already on record. The case was adjourned to July 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts