SHAIKH AHMED SHAIKH ABBASSALI CHINCHOTE, DIED THROUGH L RS vs MOHD AMINUDDIN MOHD GULAM RASOOL SIDDIQ AND OTHERS — SA/271/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030188242026
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2026
Filing Number
SA/14016/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
SA/271/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIKH AHMED SHAIKH ABBASSALI CHINCHOTE, DIED THROUGH L RS
Adv. ANSARI ASFIA NUZHAT
1A GOUSIA ANJUM AHMED SHAIKH DIED
1b SAYEED AHMED SHAIKH
1c HASHMI AASARA BEGUM SAYYAD SAJID
1d BIBI ASAMA LAYAKHALI DESHMUKH
1e SHAIKH BIBI ALIYA BEGUM ATIQUE ANSARI
1f BIBI FAIZA AFZAL
1g ABU AHMED BILAL AHMED SHAIKH
1i SOHAIL ABU AHMED SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
MOHD AMINUDDIN MOHD GULAM RASOOL SIDDIQ AND OTHERS
Adv. TIRTHKAR GAJANAN NANASAHEB FOR R. NO. 1 1123
ADBUL SAMAD ABDUL AZIZ SIDDIQUI DIED THROUGH L RS 2a RAZIYA BEGUM ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI
2b SABIHA ABDUL JABBAR SHAIKH
2c ABDUL HAFEEZ ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI
2d SHAHEDA AKBER SAYED
2e FARZANA ASHRAF SIDDIQUI
2f NASERA NASER PATHAN
2g ABDULLAH ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI
2h ABDUL SATTAR ABDUL SAMAD
2i FATEMA ALTAF SHAIKH
2j ABDUL KARIM ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI
2k ABDUL MANNAN ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI
MOHD WAJID MOHD AMINUDDIN SIDDIQUI
MOHD SAMAD ASHRAFODDIN USTAD
SAYED ASHRAFODDIN ABDUL SAMAD DIED THROUGH L RS 5a SYED ANWAR SYED ASHRAFODDIN USTAD
5b SYED IBRAHIM SYED ASHRAFODDIN USTAD
5c ZAIBUNNISA AMINODDIN SIDDIQUI
5d NAFIS CHANDPASHA SHAIKH
SYED MUKHTADEER ASHROFODDIN USTAD
MOHAMAD PASHA MOHAMAD DIED THROUGH L RS 7a MUBEEN AHMAD MOHD PASHA KHALI SIDDIQUI
7b MOIZ AHMAD MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHAIL SIDDIUQI
7 c MUNEER MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHALIL SIDDIQUI
7d KHURSHID BEGUM MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHAIL SIDDIQUI
7e NUZHAT BEGUM M A QIYUM DIED THROUHG L RS 7e1 MOHAMAD ABDUL QIYUM SHAIKH ABDUL RAZAK
SABA JAMIL SYED
ZEBA WASIM BIDIR
SHAIKH MOHAMAD ZISHAN ABDUL QIYUM
SHAIKH MOHAMAD ETISHAM ABDUL QIYUM
NAZMA IRFAN SHAIKH
SOW SUSHILABAI RAMESHETTI BIRAJDAR DIED L RS
RAMSHETTI MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR DIED L R S SHANKAR MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR
UMAKANT MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR
PADMAVATI SHIVARAJ BUKABULLARI
RAGINI HARSHETTI CHANKANPATHE
MANJULABAI ALIAST MANGALABAI SHRIKANT MULGE
SARJANABAI RAMSHETTI BIRAJDAR
MOHD KHAJA ABDUL QUADER DIED LRS 9A HUSAINBI MOHAMMAD KHAJE
DUAD MOHAMMAD KHAJA
FAROOQ MOHAMMAD KHAJA
YOUSUF MOHAMMAD KHAJA
SALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA
SHAFI MOHAMMAD KHAJA
RAFI MOHAMMAD KHAJA
SAMI MOHAMMAD KHAJA
FASI MOHAMMAD KHAJA
ILIYAS MOHAMMAD KHAJA
ALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA
KALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA
JAMEEL MOHAMMAD KHAJA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-07-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SA 271/2026 and SA 272/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 The case was called on for hearing. The court admitted the appeals and identified three substantial questions of law: (1) whether appellate courts properly applied Sections 16 and 20 of the Specific Reliefs Act; (2) whether the first appellate court's findings were perverse to plaintiff's evidence; and (3) whether an agreement to sell dated 12.07.1987 was properly interpreted. Notice was issued to respondents, returnable 02.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA 271/2026 and SA 272/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 The case was called on for hearing. The court admitted the appeals and identified three substantial questions of law: (1) whether appellate courts properly applied Sections 16 and 20 of the Specific Reliefs Act; (2) whether the first appellate court's findings were perverse to plaintiff's evidence; and (3) whether an agreement to sell dated 12.07.1987 was properly interpreted. Notice was issued to respondents, returnable 02.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts