SHAIKH AHMED SHAIKH ABBASSALI CHINCHOTE, DIED THROUGH L RS vs MOHD AMINUDDIN MOHD GULAM RASOOL SIDDIQ AND OTHERS — SA/271/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030188242026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

SA/14016/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

SA/271/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAIKH AHMED SHAIKH ABBASSALI CHINCHOTE, DIED THROUGH L RS

    Adv. ANSARI ASFIA NUZHAT

  2. 2.1A GOUSIA ANJUM AHMED SHAIKH DIED

  3. 3.1b SAYEED AHMED SHAIKH

  4. 4.1c HASHMI AASARA BEGUM SAYYAD SAJID

  5. 5.1d BIBI ASAMA LAYAKHALI DESHMUKH

  6. 6.1e SHAIKH BIBI ALIYA BEGUM ATIQUE ANSARI

  7. 7.1f BIBI FAIZA AFZAL

  8. 8.1g ABU AHMED BILAL AHMED SHAIKH

  9. 9.1i SOHAIL ABU AHMED SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD AMINUDDIN MOHD GULAM RASOOL SIDDIQ AND OTHERS

    Adv. TIRTHKAR GAJANAN NANASAHEB FOR R. NO. 1 1123

  2. 2.ADBUL SAMAD ABDUL AZIZ SIDDIQUI DIED THROUGH L RS 2a RAZIYA BEGUM ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI

  3. 3.2b SABIHA ABDUL JABBAR SHAIKH

  4. 4.2c ABDUL HAFEEZ ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI

  5. 5.2d SHAHEDA AKBER SAYED

  6. 6.2e FARZANA ASHRAF SIDDIQUI

  7. 7.2f NASERA NASER PATHAN

  8. 8.2g ABDULLAH ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI

  9. 9.2h ABDUL SATTAR ABDUL SAMAD

  10. 10.2i FATEMA ALTAF SHAIKH

  11. 11.2j ABDUL KARIM ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI

  12. 12.2k ABDUL MANNAN ABDUL SAMAD SIDDIQUI

  13. 13.MOHD WAJID MOHD AMINUDDIN SIDDIQUI

  14. 14.MOHD SAMAD ASHRAFODDIN USTAD

  15. 15.SAYED ASHRAFODDIN ABDUL SAMAD DIED THROUGH L RS 5a SYED ANWAR SYED ASHRAFODDIN USTAD

  16. 16.5b SYED IBRAHIM SYED ASHRAFODDIN USTAD

  17. 17.5c ZAIBUNNISA AMINODDIN SIDDIQUI

  18. 18.5d NAFIS CHANDPASHA SHAIKH

  19. 19.SYED MUKHTADEER ASHROFODDIN USTAD

  20. 20.MOHAMAD PASHA MOHAMAD DIED THROUGH L RS 7a MUBEEN AHMAD MOHD PASHA KHALI SIDDIQUI

  21. 21.7b MOIZ AHMAD MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHAIL SIDDIUQI

  22. 22.7 c MUNEER MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHALIL SIDDIQUI

  23. 23.7d KHURSHID BEGUM MOHD PASHA ALIAS KHAIL SIDDIQUI

  24. 24.7e NUZHAT BEGUM M A QIYUM DIED THROUHG L RS 7e1 MOHAMAD ABDUL QIYUM SHAIKH ABDUL RAZAK

  25. 25.SABA JAMIL SYED

  26. 26.ZEBA WASIM BIDIR

  27. 27.SHAIKH MOHAMAD ZISHAN ABDUL QIYUM

  28. 28.SHAIKH MOHAMAD ETISHAM ABDUL QIYUM

  29. 29.NAZMA IRFAN SHAIKH

  30. 30.SOW SUSHILABAI RAMESHETTI BIRAJDAR DIED L RS

  31. 31.RAMSHETTI MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR DIED L R S SHANKAR MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR

  32. 32.UMAKANT MADHAVRAO BIRAJDAR

  33. 33.PADMAVATI SHIVARAJ BUKABULLARI

  34. 34.RAGINI HARSHETTI CHANKANPATHE

  35. 35.MANJULABAI ALIAST MANGALABAI SHRIKANT MULGE

  36. 36.SARJANABAI RAMSHETTI BIRAJDAR

  37. 37.MOHD KHAJA ABDUL QUADER DIED LRS 9A HUSAINBI MOHAMMAD KHAJE

  38. 38.DUAD MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  39. 39.FAROOQ MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  40. 40.YOUSUF MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  41. 41.SALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  42. 42.SHAFI MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  43. 43.RAFI MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  44. 44.SAMI MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  45. 45.FASI MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  46. 46.ILIYAS MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  47. 47.ALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  48. 48.KALIM MOHAMMAD KHAJA

  49. 49.JAMEEL MOHAMMAD KHAJA

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: SA 271/2026 and SA 272/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 The case was called on for hearing. The court admitted the appeals and identified three substantial questions of law: (1) whether appellate courts properly applied Sections 16 and 20 of the Specific Reliefs Act; (2) whether the first appellate court's findings were perverse to plaintiff's evidence; and (3) whether an agreement to sell dated 12.07.1987 was properly interpreted. Notice was issued to respondents, returnable 02.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 271/2026 and SA 272/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 The case was called on for hearing. The court admitted the appeals and identified three substantial questions of law: (1) whether appellate courts properly applied Sections 16 and 20 of the Specific Reliefs Act; (2) whether the first appellate court's findings were perverse to plaintiff's evidence; and (3) whether an agreement to sell dated 12.07.1987 was properly interpreted. Notice was issued to respondents, returnable 02.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case