HEERABAI DATTATRAY WADGHULE vs RATNAMALA ALIAS GAURI BHAGWAN WADGHULE AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1832/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030188172026

Filing Number

APPLN/4794/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1832/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEERABAI DATTATRAY WADGHULE

    Adv. Rakh Arun V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATNAMALA ALIAS GAURI BHAGWAN WADGHULE AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. COPY SERVED TO PP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The Aurangabad High Court granted bail to Ratnamala Wadghule, accused of assaulting the informant (Heerabai) during a fatal attack on Heerabai's son Ganesh in February 2026. The court found Wadghule's role "venial in nature"—she was only alleged to have struck the informant's hand with a stick, not the deceased—and noted she has two young children with her imprisoned husband. Bail was granted on conditions including a ₹30,000 bond, residence away from the disputed family property, non-contact with witnesses, and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1832/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court granted bail to Ratnamala Wadghule, accused of assaulting the informant (Heerabai) during a fatal attack on Heerabai's son Ganesh in February 2026. The court found Wadghule's role "venial in nature"—she was only alleged to have struck the informant's hand with a stick, not the deceased—and noted she has two young children with her imprisoned husband. Bail was granted on conditions including a ₹30,000 bond, residence away from the disputed family property, non-contact with witnesses, and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case