HARSHITA AMIT AGRAWAL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1825/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030187342026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
APPLN/4772/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
APPLN/1825/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSHITA AMIT AGRAWAL AND OTHERS
Adv. GANDHI AMOL SUBHASH
AMAR KISHAN TIBREWAL
RAJIV DULICHAND AGRAWAL
ANJAN AMIT AGRAWAL
AMIT SHRIKISAN AGRAWAL
SUSHMA AMIT AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
PIYU ANJAN AGRAWAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to quash FIR No.392/2024 registered at CIDCO Police Station for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, and 506 IPC. After successful mediation between the parties, the husband and wife (informant Piyu Anjan Agarwal) reached an amicable settlement with the husband depositing Rs. 20 lakhs as per compromise terms. The court found the crime arose from matrimonial discord and, given the parties' settlement and the informant's unwillingness to prosecute, allowed the quashing application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to quash FIR No.392/2024 registered at CIDCO Police Station for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, and 506 IPC. After successful mediation between the parties, the husband and wife (informant Piyu Anjan Agarwal) reached an amicable settlement with the husband depositing Rs. 20 lakhs as per compromise terms. The court found the crime arose from matrimonial discord and, given the parties' settlement and the informant's unwillingness to prosecute, allowed the quashing application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts