HARSHITA AMIT AGRAWAL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1825/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030187342026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/4772/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1825/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSHITA AMIT AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

    Adv. GANDHI AMOL SUBHASH

  2. 2.AMAR KISHAN TIBREWAL

  3. 3.RAJIV DULICHAND AGRAWAL

  4. 4.ANJAN AMIT AGRAWAL

  5. 5.AMIT SHRIKISAN AGRAWAL

  6. 6.SUSHMA AMIT AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.PIYU ANJAN AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to quash FIR No.392/2024 registered at CIDCO Police Station for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, and 506 IPC. After successful mediation between the parties, the husband and wife (informant Piyu Anjan Agarwal) reached an amicable settlement with the husband depositing Rs. 20 lakhs as per compromise terms. The court found the crime arose from matrimonial discord and, given the parties' settlement and the informant's unwillingness to prosecute, allowed the quashing application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1825/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to quash FIR No.392/2024 registered at CIDCO Police Station for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, and 506 IPC. After successful mediation between the parties, the husband and wife (informant Piyu Anjan Agarwal) reached an amicable settlement with the husband depositing Rs. 20 lakhs as per compromise terms. The court found the crime arose from matrimonial discord and, given the parties' settlement and the informant's unwillingness to prosecute, allowed the quashing application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case