YOGESH BADRINATH DANDAGE AND ORS vs THE SUB DIVISION OFFICER PAITHAN AND ORS — WP/5293/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030186722026

Filing Number

WP/13897/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/5293/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH BADRINATH DANDAGE AND ORS

    Adv. SHINDE SANKET SUNIL

  2. 2.DYANOBA DADA DANDAGE

  3. 3.KRUSHNA BAPPASAHEB DANDAGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISION OFFICER PAITHAN AND ORS

    Adv. PRADEEP G TAMBADE AND SUHASINI JADHAV FOR R.NO. 3 TO 5 1123

  2. 2.THE TAHASILDAR

  3. 3.RAM KUNDALIK DANDAGE

  4. 4.VISHNU KUNDALIK DANDAGE

  5. 5.MANDA ANKUSH SHINDE

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5293/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued an interim order in a dispute involving a customary pathway. The petitioners challenged a respondent's application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, arguing it violated procedural requirements and that the Tahsildar's panchnama (inspection report) failed to establish the claimed obstruction of the customary way. The court granted ad-interim relief as prayed by petitioners, but conditioned it on petitioners not obstructing the suit way as a pathway for respondents. The case was adjourned to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5293/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued an interim order in a dispute involving a customary pathway. The petitioners challenged a respondent's application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, arguing it violated procedural requirements and that the Tahsildar's panchnama (inspection report) failed to establish the claimed obstruction of the customary way. The court granted ad-interim relief as prayed by petitioners, but conditioned it on petitioners not obstructing the suit way as a pathway for respondents. The case was adjourned to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case