YOGESH BADRINATH DANDAGE AND ORS vs THE SUB DIVISION OFFICER PAITHAN AND ORS — WP/5293/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030186722026
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
WP/13897/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
WP/5293/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YOGESH BADRINATH DANDAGE AND ORS
Adv. SHINDE SANKET SUNIL
DYANOBA DADA DANDAGE
KRUSHNA BAPPASAHEB DANDAGE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB DIVISION OFFICER PAITHAN AND ORS
Adv. PRADEEP G TAMBADE AND SUHASINI JADHAV FOR R.NO. 3 TO 5 1123
THE TAHASILDAR
RAM KUNDALIK DANDAGE
VISHNU KUNDALIK DANDAGE
MANDA ANKUSH SHINDE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-06-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5293/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued an interim order in a dispute involving a customary pathway. The petitioners challenged a respondent's application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, arguing it violated procedural requirements and that the Tahsildar's panchnama (inspection report) failed to establish the claimed obstruction of the customary way. The court granted ad-interim relief as prayed by petitioners, but conditioned it on petitioners not obstructing the suit way as a pathway for respondents. The case was adjourned to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5293/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued an interim order in a dispute involving a customary pathway. The petitioners challenged a respondent's application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, arguing it violated procedural requirements and that the Tahsildar's panchnama (inspection report) failed to establish the claimed obstruction of the customary way. The court granted ad-interim relief as prayed by petitioners, but conditioned it on petitioners not obstructing the suit way as a pathway for respondents. The case was adjourned to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts