CHANDRAMUNI KAMAJI HINGOLE ADV AMIT ARUNKUMAR MUKHEDKAR vs PADAMSINGH VITHAL JANAKWADE AND ANOTHER — SA/264/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030186042026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

SA/13841/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

SA/264/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAMUNI KAMAJI HINGOLE ADV AMIT ARUNKUMAR MUKHEDKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PADAMSINGH VITHAL JANAKWADE AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.Vithalrao s/o Tukaram Janakwade

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  3. 07-Jul-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: SA 264/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) admitted a second appeal by Chandramuni Kamaji Hingole challenging the District Judge's decision that reversed the trial court's judgment. The trial court had dismissed a suit seeking cancellation of a 1990 sale deed and allowed the appellant's counter-claim for possession. The appellate court reversed this, prompting the High Court to issue notice returnable on 07.07.2026. The court identified substantial questions of law regarding whether the appellate findings were perverse and whether judgment was legally tenable given the registered sale deed remains unset aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/264/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 264/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) admitted a second appeal by Chandramuni Kamaji Hingole challenging the District Judge's decision that reversed the trial court's judgment. The trial court had dismissed a suit seeking cancellation of a 1990 sale deed and allowed the appellant's counter-claim for possession. The appellate court reversed this, prompting the High Court to issue notice returnable on 07.07.2026. The court identified substantial questions of law regarding whether the appellate findings were perverse and whether judgment was legally tenable given the registered sale deed remains unset aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case