JAGANATH GOVINDRAO PHULARE THIGALE GIRISH KALIDASRAO vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER — CA/5595/2026

Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030185672026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

CA/13816/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CA/5595/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGANATH GOVINDRAO PHULARE THIGALE GIRISH KALIDASRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the Civil Application in the Commercial Arbitration Appeal between Jagannath Govindrao Phulare and Union of India. The case was stood over to 3rd July 2026 at the applicant's advocate's request. The applicant was directed to serve a copy of the Civil Application on the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5595/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the Civil Application in the Commercial Arbitration Appeal between Jagannath Govindrao Phulare and Union of India. The case was stood over to 3rd July 2026 at the applicant's advocate's request. The applicant was directed to serve a copy of the Civil Application on the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case