Ramakant Narayan Agrwal and Another PANDE DIPESH DEELIP vs National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another — CA/5435/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030185622026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CA/13814/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CA/5435/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramakant Narayan Agrwal and Another PANDE DIPESH DEELIP

  2. 2.Pravin Bankatlal Agrawal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another

  2. 2.Competent Authority

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/5435/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted. The court granted permission to delete Respondent No. 6 (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from the array of respondents in Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025, as she was erroneously added and was not a party in the original proceedings. The court also ordered correction of a typographical error in the previous order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/5435/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted. The court granted permission to delete Respondent No. 6 (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from the array of respondents in Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025, as she was erroneously added and was not a party in the original proceedings. The court also ordered correction of a typographical error in the previous order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case