Dhondu Harchand Bhil Dead Through its Lrs. Kashinath Bhondu Bhil and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP vs National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another — CA/5433/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030185612026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
CA/13813/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
CA/5433/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhondu Harchand Bhil Dead Through its Lrs. Kashinath Bhondu Bhil and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP
Ashok Dhondu Bhil
Barku Dhondu Bhil
Mangalabai Mahadu Bhil
Nirmalabai Mahadu Bhil
Devkabai Dhondu Bhil
Respondent(s)
National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another
Competent Authority
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary of CA 5433/2026: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned multiple consolidated civil applications filed by claimants against the National Highways Authority of India to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted. The court granted permission to delete Respondent No. 6 (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 as she was erroneously added, and ordered correction of a typographical error in a prior order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CA 5433/2026: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned multiple consolidated civil applications filed by claimants against the National Highways Authority of India to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted. The court granted permission to delete Respondent No. 6 (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 as she was erroneously added, and ordered correction of a typographical error in a prior order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts