Rajiv Mohanlal Agrawal and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP vs National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another — CA/5445/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030185582026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2026
Filing Number
CA/13810/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
CA/5445/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajiv Mohanlal Agrawal and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP
Ashish Subhash Agarwal
Ravindra Uttamrao Wagh
Respondent(s)
National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Director Shivaji V. Pawar and Another
Competent Authority
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: In CA 5445/2026 (heard with related applications), the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad adjourned the matter to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted, allowing respondent NHAI time to file replies to the applications. The court granted permission to delete an erroneously added respondent (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 and ordered corrections to a previous order dated May 4, 2026, where statutory references were incorrectly typed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In CA 5445/2026 (heard with related applications), the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad adjourned the matter to June 9, 2026, with no further adjournments permitted, allowing respondent NHAI time to file replies to the applications. The court granted permission to delete an erroneously added respondent (Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 and ordered corrections to a previous order dated May 4, 2026, where statutory references were incorrectly typed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts