Pravin Nimba Patil and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP vs National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Directpr Shivaji V. Pawar and Another — CA/5438/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030185572026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2026
Filing Number
CA/13809/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
CA/5438/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pravin Nimba Patil and Others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP
Pralhad Bhika Chaudhari
Atul Chhotulal Jain
Mangesh Dashrath Surulkar
Vipulkumar Vijaykumar Jain
Respondent(s)
National Highways Authority of India, Thru. Project Directpr Shivaji V. Pawar and Another
Competent Authority
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA 5438/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the consolidated civil applications filed against the National Highways Authority of India to June 9, 2026, granting the respondents time to file their reply with a warning that no further adjournment would be permitted. The Court granted permission to delete Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil (Respondent No. 6) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 as she was erroneously added, and corrected a typographical error in the previous order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA 5438/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the consolidated civil applications filed against the National Highways Authority of India to June 9, 2026, granting the respondents time to file their reply with a warning that no further adjournment would be permitted. The Court granted permission to delete Shrimati Shakuntala Tanhaji Patil (Respondent No. 6) from Arbitration Appeal No. 10/2025 as she was erroneously added, and corrected a typographical error in the previous order regarding statutory references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts