ANUSHKA BALAJI KOTLAWAR MINOR THR FATHER BALAJI L KOTLAWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5281/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030184962026
Filing Number
WP/13759/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
WP/5281/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANUSHKA BALAJI KOTLAWAR MINOR THR FATHER BALAJI L KOTLAWAR
Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
-
2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE KINWAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe within three months, noting that a vigilance inquiry report from her cousin was already on record and could be adopted. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5281/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe within three months, noting that a vigilance inquiry report from her cousin was already on record and could be adopted. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts