ANUSHKA BALAJI KOTLAWAR MINOR THR FATHER BALAJI L KOTLAWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5281/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030184962026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/13759/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

WP/5281/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

ANUSHKA BALAJI KOTLAWAR MINOR THR FATHER BALAJI L KOTLAWAR

Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE KINWAT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

08-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe within three months, noting that a vigilance inquiry report from her cousin was already on record and could be adopted. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe within three months, noting that a vigilance inquiry report from her cousin was already on record and could be adopted. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case