MUSTAK BEG JAHUR BEG AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5078/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030182262026
Filing Number
WP/13547/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/5078/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUSTAK BEG JAHUR BEG AND ORS
Adv. Murkute J.M.
-
2.JABBARITBAR KHAN
-
3.MAHEMUDA SHAIK MATHHU
-
4.ABEDA BEE RAZAK DIED THR HER LR ARIF KHAN RAZAK KHAN
-
5.ROSHAN BEE SHAIKU MAJID
-
6.NASIM BEE ALIMUDDIN SHAIKH
-
7.SARIFA SHEIKU BASIR
-
8.MOHAMMAD JUBER GULAM KHATIK
-
9.ASIF GUFAR KHATIK
-
10.IBRAHIM SHABBIR KHATIK
-
11.AKBAR ALI SAYYED ALI
-
12.AKBAR KHAN MOHAD KHAN
-
13.SAIRABEE SAYED SAINED
-
14.ISAMUDDIN SAMSHODDIN SHEIKH
-
15.SHAIKH MUKHATAR SEUKH HAIDER
-
16.SHAIKU SALIM SHAIKH HYDER
-
17.PARYANA BEE AMINODDIN SHAIKH
-
18.SAYEED HUSEN SAYEED HASEN DIED THR LRS SAYED SALIM SAYED HUSEN
-
19.AHEMAD BEE IBRAHIM BEG MIRZA DIED THR LRS ZAINAL ABEDIN BEG JABUR
-
20.NASEEM BEE SAYED SHABBIR MANIYAR
-
21.MUSALMAN JAVED SHAIKH RASID
-
22.SHAIKU JAFAR SHIKU SUPADU
-
23.MATIN KHAN MIYA MATULLAKHAN PATHAN
-
24.KAMRUNISA BEE SAYEED GULAB DIED THR LRS MOHMOOD SAYEDD GULAM
-
25.RASIDABEE ABDUL GUFAR SHAH
-
26.ALTAF SHAH JUMAN SHAH FAKIR
-
27.AHESAN MURTUNULLA KHAN MISRULLA KHAN
-
28.SAYEED YUSUF SHAH DIED THR LRS JAHERA BEE SAYEED SHAH
-
29.RAFIQ KHAN LATIF KHAN
-
30.NOOR BEG KHURSHID BEG DIED THR LRS KHURSHID BEG NOOR BEG
-
31.NASIM SHAKUR PINJARI
-
32.SALIMA BEE MALAT RAFIQ
-
33.KALIM SHAIKH MUNIR
-
34.SALIM BEE HAMID SHAIKH
-
35.SHABANA BEE AZIZ PATHAN
-
36.KHATUN BEE HUSUNUDDIN PINJARI
-
37.AFROZ BEE PINJIR BEG
-
38.PARVIN SHAKIR PINJARI
-
39.SHAIKH BASIR SHAIKH HAYAT
-
40.KURBAN SHAIKH MUSA
-
41.FIROZ KHAN MOHAMAD KHAN
-
42.NISAR BEG JAHUR BEG
-
43.SHAIKH FARIDA MOHIYODDIN
-
44.GULSENBEE RAFIYODDIN SHAIK
-
45.MUJAWAR AYAJ SHAIKH SIKANDAR
-
46.SHAIKH ISMAIL HANI
-
47.SHAKIRABEE SHAIKH AMJAD
-
48.SATTAR SHAIK RAHEMAN
-
49.RIYAZODDIN FAYAZODDIN KAZI
-
50.AFROZAINUDDIN SHAIKH
-
51.GULAM JABBAR ALIAS MUKKU PHELWAN DIED THR LRS AISHA BEE GULAM JABBAR
-
52.SHAIKH YUSUF SHAIKH SALIM
-
53.SHAHABUDDIN SHARFOODIN KHATIK
-
54.MUJAHID SHAIKU HAMID DHOBI
-
55.IMRAN BEG AKBAR BEG
-
56.KALIM KHAN HUSEN KHAN
-
57.MUSTAKAHEMAD SHAIKH MUNIR
-
58.SAYEED JAMIL SAYED HUSEN
-
59.SHAIKH HUSEN GUFAR
-
60.IMRAN RAFIQ SHAIKH
-
61.HEENA KAUSAR SALMAN KHAN
-
62.RAFIYODDIN SHAIKH FATTY
-
63.AKILAHEMAD ABDUL KADAR SHEIKH
-
64.SHAIKH SABIR SHAIKH AJAGAR
-
65.SALIM SHAIKH SABDAR MEHTAR
-
66.SADAM SHAIKU RASID
-
67.SHAMIM BEE SHAIKH MUKHATAR
-
68.TABASUM BANO JABBAR SHAH
-
69.USMAN HANI MOHMAD IBRAHIM
-
70.AMIR KHAN SUPDU KHAN
-
71.NOORKHAN RASID KHAN PATHAN
-
72.SALMA BEE FAKRUDDIN KHAN
-
73.SAYEED MUKHTAR SHAH
-
74.GULAB NOOR SHAIKH
-
75.SHAMIN SALIM SHEIKH
-
76.SHABANA BEE SALIM KHAN PATHAN
-
77.KHALEDA BEE YAKUB KHAN
-
78.ZAKIYA BEE AYUB KHAN
-
79.JAMILABEE SALAUDDIN KAZI
-
80.KARIYABEE RAFIQ AHEMAD
-
81.SAYEED SABIR SAYEED WAJIR
-
82.AMINABEE NOOR MOHMD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DHULE
-
3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DHULE
-
4.THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DHULE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued to petitioners occupying properties in Dhule for 50 years, directing the Sub-Divisional Officer (Irrigation Department) to decide the petitioners' objections within eight weeks while restraining coercive action. The court held that property tax payment alone doesn't legalize unauthorized construction, rejected the petitioners' reliance on a recent Government Resolution without following proper regularization procedures, and noted an alternate civil remedy was available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5078/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued to petitioners occupying properties in Dhule for 50 years, directing the Sub-Divisional Officer (Irrigation Department) to decide the petitioners' objections within eight weeks while restraining coercive action. The court held that property tax payment alone doesn't legalize unauthorized construction, rejected the petitioners' reliance on a recent Government Resolution without following proper regularization procedures, and noted an alternate civil remedy was available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts