ABDUL AASEF HAJI ABDUL RAHIM BAGWAN vs TASLIM BEGUM SHAIKH ISMAIL AND ANOTHER — WP/5219/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030182252026

Filing Number

WP/13546/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WP/5219/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Specific Relief Act 1963

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL AASEF HAJI ABDUL RAHIM BAGWAN

    Adv. Rathi Swapnil S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TASLIM BEGUM SHAIKH ISMAIL AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.MUJAHID KHAN NASEEB KHAN PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The Aurangabad High Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to withdraw and refile before the Trial Court. The petitioner sought to amend the plaint to include documents supporting his possession claims over the disputed property, which were unavailable at the time of the suit's institution, and to rely on an agreement of sale that the Trial Court had already impounded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to withdraw and refile before the Trial Court. The petitioner sought to amend the plaint to include documents supporting his possession claims over the disputed property, which were unavailable at the time of the suit's institution, and to rely on an agreement of sale that the Trial Court had already impounded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case