SUVARNA SAMBHAJI WAGHMARE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS — WP/5818/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030181402026
Filing Number
WP/13486/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP/5818/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUVARNA SAMBHAJI WAGHMARE AND ORS
Adv. R. R. Kale
-
2.SATISH PARMESHWAR WAGHMARE
-
3.SAMBHAJI MANIKA WAGHMARE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS
-
2.THE TAHASILDAR
-
3.THE CHIEF OFFICER, BHOKAR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
-
4.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER THE
-
5.ADIWASI GRUH NIRMAN SOCIETY LTD.
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary - WP 5818/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the writ petition filed by Suvarna Sambhaji Waghmare and others against the State of Maharashtra and officials. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 13.07.2026, with the AGP waiving notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Petitioners were permitted to serve private respondents through alternate modes and file affidavits of service before the returnable date. The case is adjourned pending response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5818/2026
Case Summary - WP 5818/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the writ petition filed by Suvarna Sambhaji Waghmare and others against the State of Maharashtra and officials. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 13.07.2026, with the AGP waiving notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Petitioners were permitted to serve private respondents through alternate modes and file affidavits of service before the returnable date. The case is adjourned pending response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts