ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — CA/5708/2026
Case under Family Court Act 1985 Section 19. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030181162023
Filing Number
CA/13802/2023
Filing Date
24-04-2023
Registration No
CA/5708/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE
Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.
Respondent(s)
SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-07-2023 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 11-07-2023 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
Orders
Summary of CA/5708/2026 The High Court of Judicatur at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals by accepting an amicable settlement between the parties. The wife (appellant) and husband (respondent)—both doctors married in 2017—had filed conflicting petitions: one for restitution of conjugal rights and one for marriage annulment. After court-ordered mediation succeeded, both parties voluntarily settled their dispute with the husband paying ₹8,50,000 to the wife. The court found further litigation unnecessary and decreed both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CA/5708/2026 The High Court of Judicatur at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals by accepting an amicable settlement between the parties. The wife (appellant) and husband (respondent)—both doctors married in 2017—had filed conflicting petitions: one for restitution of conjugal rights and one for marriage annulment. After court-ordered mediation succeeded, both parties voluntarily settled their dispute with the husband paying ₹8,50,000 to the wife. The court found further litigation unnecessary and decreed both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts