ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — CA/5708/2026

Case under Family Court Act 1985 Section 19. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030181162023

Filing Number

CA/13802/2023

Filing Date

24-Apr-2023

Registration No

CA/5708/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act 1985 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE

    Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Summary of CA/5708/2026 The High Court of Judicatur at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals by accepting an amicable settlement between the parties. The wife (appellant) and husband (respondent)—both doctors married in 2017—had filed conflicting petitions: one for restitution of conjugal rights and one for marriage annulment. After court-ordered mediation succeeded, both parties voluntarily settled their dispute with the husband paying ₹8,50,000 to the wife. The court found further litigation unnecessary and decreed both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2023

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  4. 04-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5708/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA/5708/2026 The High Court of Judicatur at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals by accepting an amicable settlement between the parties. The wife (appellant) and husband (respondent)—both doctors married in 2017—had filed conflicting petitions: one for restitution of conjugal rights and one for marriage annulment. After court-ordered mediation succeeded, both parties voluntarily settled their dispute with the husband paying ₹8,50,000 to the wife. The court found further litigation unnecessary and decreed both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case