ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — CA/5707/2026

Case under Family Court Act 1985 Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030181142023

Filing Number

CA/13801/2023

Filing Date

24-Apr-2023

Registration No

CA/5707/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act 1985 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE

    Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Summary of CA/5707/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of two family court appeals through settlement. After the parties were referred to mediation, Ashwini and Shrikant Rahane (both doctors) reached an amicable settlement and agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court accepted their settlement terms, under which the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and disposed of both appeals accordingly with decrees drawn in terms of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2023

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  4. 04-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5707/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA/5707/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of two family court appeals through settlement. After the parties were referred to mediation, Ashwini and Shrikant Rahane (both doctors) reached an amicable settlement and agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court accepted their settlement terms, under which the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and disposed of both appeals accordingly with decrees drawn in terms of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case