ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — CA/5707/2026

Case under Family Court Act 1985 Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030181142023

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/13801/2023

Filing Date

24-04-2023

Registration No

CA/5707/2026

Registration Date

02-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act 1985 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE

Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

04-07-2023

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

11-07-2023

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Summary of CA/5707/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of two family court appeals through settlement. After the parties were referred to mediation, Ashwini and Shrikant Rahane (both doctors) reached an amicable settlement and agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court accepted their settlement terms, under which the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and disposed of both appeals accordingly with decrees drawn in terms of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA/5707/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of two family court appeals through settlement. After the parties were referred to mediation, Ashwini and Shrikant Rahane (both doctors) reached an amicable settlement and agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court accepted their settlement terms, under which the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and disposed of both appeals accordingly with decrees drawn in terms of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case