ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — HCBM30181132023

Case under Family Court Act 1985 Section 19. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM030181132023

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

FCA/13800/2023

Filing Date

24-04-2023

Judge

SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

Coram

SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act 1985 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE

Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE

Hearing History

Judge: SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

20-06-2023

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

04-07-2023

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

11-07-2023

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

CASE SUMMARY The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals through settlement on May 7, 2026. Wife Ashwini Shrikant Rahane appealed against a Family Court judgment that dismissed her restitution of conjugal rights petition and granted her husband Shrikant Ramnath Rahane's marriage annulment petition. Following successful mediation, the parties reached an amicable settlement whereby the husband paid Rs. 8,50,000 to the wife. The court accepted the settlement, allowed the delayed appeal with condonation of delay, and disposed of both appeals in terms of the compromise agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals through settlement on May 7, 2026. Wife Ashwini Shrikant Rahane appealed against a Family Court judgment that dismissed her restitution of conjugal rights petition and granted her husband Shrikant Ramnath Rahane's marriage annulment petition. Following successful mediation, the parties reached an amicable settlement whereby the husband paid Rs. 8,50,000 to the wife. The court accepted the settlement, allowed the delayed appeal with condonation of delay, and disposed of both appeals in terms of the compromise agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case