SACHIN PARMESHWAR PAWAL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/925/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030181022026

Filing Number

BA/4631/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

BA/925/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132, 274, 275, 223, 123, 45
Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Section 59

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN PARMESHWAR PAWAL AND OTHERS

    Adv. MORE ABHIJIT S.

  2. 2.SATISH TUKARAM SONDGE

  3. 3.SANJAY SUBHASH JAGTAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the bail applications filed by Sachin Parmeshwar Pawal, Satish Tukaram Sondge, and Sanjay Subhash Jagtap against Maharashtra State. Notice was issued returnable on 19.06.2026, with the Court directing police station papers and chargesheet copies to be filed. For POCSO Act cases, victim notification through the Investigating Officer was mandated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/925/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the bail applications filed by Sachin Parmeshwar Pawal, Satish Tukaram Sondge, and Sanjay Subhash Jagtap against Maharashtra State. Notice was issued returnable on 19.06.2026, with the Court directing police station papers and chargesheet copies to be filed. For POCSO Act cases, victim notification through the Investigating Officer was mandated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case