KIRAN MOTIRAM BHOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/598/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030180502026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/4606/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

WP/598/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,406,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

KIRAN MOTIRAM BHOLE

Adv. NIRANJAN VASANT DHAKE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Snehal alias Gayatri Rajesh Bhole

The Assistant Director

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

05-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Case Summary: WP/598/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Kiran Motiram Bhole's writ petition as withdrawn, directing him to approach the trial court instead to challenge three specific orders: the non-bailable warrant (12.12.2017), proclamation under Section 87 CrPC (25.09.2023), and lookout notice (08.09.2025). The court noted the petitioner works in Australia and directed expeditious disposal within three weeks if an application is filed, while keeping other prayers open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/598/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Kiran Motiram Bhole's writ petition as withdrawn, directing him to approach the trial court instead to challenge three specific orders: the non-bailable warrant (12.12.2017), proclamation under Section 87 CrPC (25.09.2023), and lookout notice (08.09.2025). The court noted the petitioner works in Australia and directed expeditious disposal within three weeks if an application is filed, while keeping other prayers open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case