KIRAN MOTIRAM BHOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/598/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030180502026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/4606/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/598/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,406,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN MOTIRAM BHOLE

    Adv. NIRANJAN VASANT DHAKE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Snehal alias Gayatri Rajesh Bhole

  3. 3.The Assistant Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/598/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Kiran Motiram Bhole's writ petition as withdrawn, directing him to approach the trial court instead to challenge three specific orders: the non-bailable warrant (12.12.2017), proclamation under Section 87 CrPC (25.09.2023), and lookout notice (08.09.2025). The court noted the petitioner works in Australia and directed expeditious disposal within three weeks if an application is filed, while keeping other prayers open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/598/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/598/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Kiran Motiram Bhole's writ petition as withdrawn, directing him to approach the trial court instead to challenge three specific orders: the non-bailable warrant (12.12.2017), proclamation under Section 87 CrPC (25.09.2023), and lookout notice (08.09.2025). The court noted the petitioner works in Australia and directed expeditious disposal within three weeks if an application is filed, while keeping other prayers open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case