MOHD JAFRODDIN MOHD BAHODDIN SUNIL VASANTRAO KURUNDKAR vs BHIMRAO GANPATI VANJE AND OTHERS — SA/261/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030180322026

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

SA/13420/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

SA/261/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

MOHD JAFRODDIN MOHD BAHODDIN SUNIL VASANTRAO KURUNDKAR

Respondent(s)

BHIMRAO GANPATI VANJE AND OTHERS

Hari S/o Pandurang Vanje

Bhagwat S/o Kerba Vanje

Chandar S/o Kerba Vanje

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

07-05-2026

AT 12:00 P.M.

25-06-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Case Summary: SA/261/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 In this Second Appeal, the High Court heard appellant Mohd Jafroddin's challenge against lower court judgments. The court identified a substantial question of law regarding whether the lower courts' findings were perverse to the evidence presented in the suit and counter-claim. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents (returnable 25.06.2026), and the appellant was directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service with affidavit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/261/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 In this Second Appeal, the High Court heard appellant Mohd Jafroddin's challenge against lower court judgments. The court identified a substantial question of law regarding whether the lower courts' findings were perverse to the evidence presented in the suit and counter-claim. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents (returnable 25.06.2026), and the appellant was directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service with affidavit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case