MOHD JAFRODDIN MOHD BAHODDIN SUNIL VASANTRAO KURUNDKAR vs BHIMRAO GANPATI VANJE AND OTHERS — SA/261/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030180322026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
SA/13420/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
SA/261/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHD JAFRODDIN MOHD BAHODDIN SUNIL VASANTRAO KURUNDKAR
Respondent(s)
BHIMRAO GANPATI VANJE AND OTHERS
Hari S/o Pandurang Vanje
Bhagwat S/o Kerba Vanje
Chandar S/o Kerba Vanje
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
AT 12:00 P.M.
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | AT 12:00 P.M. |
| 25-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SA/261/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 In this Second Appeal, the High Court heard appellant Mohd Jafroddin's challenge against lower court judgments. The court identified a substantial question of law regarding whether the lower courts' findings were perverse to the evidence presented in the suit and counter-claim. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents (returnable 25.06.2026), and the appellant was directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service with affidavit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA/261/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Date: 07.05.2026 In this Second Appeal, the High Court heard appellant Mohd Jafroddin's challenge against lower court judgments. The court identified a substantial question of law regarding whether the lower courts' findings were perverse to the evidence presented in the suit and counter-claim. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents (returnable 25.06.2026), and the appellant was directed to serve respondents through both private and regular modes of service with affidavit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts