AAKASH TARUBA MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5192/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030180122026
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
WP/13405/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
WP/5192/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AAKASH TARUBA MORE
Adv. SURADKAR YOGESH RAMDAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PUNE CITY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 02-07-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5192/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. As interim relief, the court stayed coercive action by Respondent No.3 (Commissioner of Police Pune City) pending the petition's hearing, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5192/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. As interim relief, the court stayed coercive action by Respondent No.3 (Commissioner of Police Pune City) pending the petition's hearing, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts