ANKUSH PRAVESH MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5252/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030180112026

Filing Number

WP/13404/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/5252/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKUSH PRAVESH MORE

    Adv. SURADKAR YOGESH RAMDAS

  2. 2.DY. CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, CHH. SAMBHAJINGAR

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 02/07/2026. The court issued notice to respondents and granted interim relief restraining Respondent No.3 from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) pending the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 02/07/2026. The court issued notice to respondents and granted interim relief restraining Respondent No.3 from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) pending the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case