JAGAN MAROTI KADAM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/328/2026
Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2), 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030180032026
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
APEAL/4595/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
APEAL/328/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGAN MAROTI KADAM
Adv. KUNDALWADIKAR PRATHAMESH SANDEEP
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Putalabai Rama Kale
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 19-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: APPEAL/328/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Jagan Maroti Kadam in a criminal appeal challenging the denial of pre-arrest bail by the Special Judge. The appellant was accused of caste-based abuse and outraging modesty under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a civil land dispute with Sudam Kadam's family. The Court found the FIR vague—lacking specific averments about who committed the alleged abuse—and held that SC/ST Act offences were not prima facie attracted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence, pending the informant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APPEAL/328/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Jagan Maroti Kadam in a criminal appeal challenging the denial of pre-arrest bail by the Special Judge. The appellant was accused of caste-based abuse and outraging modesty under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a civil land dispute with Sudam Kadam's family. The Court found the FIR vague—lacking specific averments about who committed the alleged abuse—and held that SC/ST Act offences were not prima facie attracted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence, pending the informant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts