JAGAN MAROTI KADAM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/328/2026
Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2), 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030180032026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
APEAL/4595/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
APEAL/328/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGAN MAROTI KADAM
Adv. KUNDALWADIKAR PRATHAMESH SANDEEP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
-
2.Putalabai Rama Kale
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
Case Summary: APPEAL/328/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Jagan Maroti Kadam in a criminal appeal challenging the denial of pre-arrest bail by the Special Judge. The appellant was accused of caste-based abuse and outraging modesty under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a civil land dispute with Sudam Kadam's family. The Court found the FIR vague—lacking specific averments about who committed the alleged abuse—and held that SC/ST Act offences were not prima facie attracted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence, pending the informant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/328/2026
Case Summary: APPEAL/328/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim bail to appellant Jagan Maroti Kadam in a criminal appeal challenging the denial of pre-arrest bail by the Special Judge. The appellant was accused of caste-based abuse and outraging modesty under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a civil land dispute with Sudam Kadam's family. The Court found the FIR vague—lacking specific averments about who committed the alleged abuse—and held that SC/ST Act offences were not prima facie attracted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence, pending the informant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts