NARENDRA VISHWANATH JADHAV vs MS CHALLANI GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY THR ITS PARTNER AND ANR — WP/5133/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030179602026

Filing Number

WP/13359/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/5133/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA VISHWANATH JADHAV

    Adv. Wani Girish V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MS CHALLANI GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY THR ITS PARTNER AND ANR

  2. 2.YOG INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NARENDRA VISHWANATH JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the writ petition filed by judgment debtor Nagendra Vishwanath Jadhav challenging the executing court's valuation of his attached property at Rs. 2,85,34,000/- for auction sale. The court found no fundamental flaw in the upset price determination, noting that both parties received fair opportunity to present evidence on valuation and the executing court properly considered the decree holder's and judgment debtor's submissions. The petition was also rejected on grounds of delay and laches, as the petitioner filed the writ in 2026 without explanation despite being aware of the 2023 orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5133/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the writ petition filed by judgment debtor Nagendra Vishwanath Jadhav challenging the executing court's valuation of his attached property at Rs. 2,85,34,000/- for auction sale. The court found no fundamental flaw in the upset price determination, noting that both parties received fair opportunity to present evidence on valuation and the executing court properly considered the decree holder's and judgment debtor's submissions. The petition was also rejected on grounds of delay and laches, as the petitioner filed the writ in 2026 without explanation despite being aware of the 2023 orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case