GAYATRI ANIL SONAWANE THROUGH GUARDIAN ANIL JANARDAN SONAWANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5117/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030179422026
Filing Number
WP/13341/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP/5117/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAYATRI ANIL SONAWANE THROUGH GUARDIAN ANIL JANARDAN SONAWANE
Adv. Thorat Chandrakant R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
-
2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, DHULE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/5117/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Gayatri Anil Sonawane's pending claim for 'Tokre Koli' Scheduled Tribe status, preferably by end of August 2026. The court accepted that a vigilance cell enquiry report of the petitioner's blood relative already on record could be adopted to support the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5117/2026
Case Summary: WP/5117/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Gayatri Anil Sonawane's pending claim for 'Tokre Koli' Scheduled Tribe status, preferably by end of August 2026. The court accepted that a vigilance cell enquiry report of the petitioner's blood relative already on record could be adopted to support the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts