MERAJ KHAN JALIL KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/743/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030179042026
Filing Number
ABA/4587/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
ABA/743/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MERAJ KHAN JALIL KHAN
Adv. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. P.P FOR R/SOLE 1123
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/743/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Meraj Khan Jalil Khan in connection with FIR No. 98 of 2026 involving conspiracy and other offences under BNS 2023. The applicant, a sitting Corporator, claimed false implication motivated by political rivalry; the prosecution alleged a deep-rooted conspiracy with grievous injury to the complainant. The court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 50,000 bond with sureties, biweekly police reporting, restricted entry to the police station jurisdiction, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition on witness intimidation or evidence tampering. The matter stands adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/743/2026
Case Summary: ABA/743/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Meraj Khan Jalil Khan in connection with FIR No. 98 of 2026 involving conspiracy and other offences under BNS 2023. The applicant, a sitting Corporator, claimed false implication motivated by political rivalry; the prosecution alleged a deep-rooted conspiracy with grievous injury to the complainant. The court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 50,000 bond with sureties, biweekly police reporting, restricted entry to the police station jurisdiction, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition on witness intimidation or evidence tampering. The matter stands adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts