SUMIT CHANDRAKANT GADEWAD MINOR THR FATHER CHANDRAKANT J GADEWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5012/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030178932026
Filing Number
WP/13298/2026
Filing Date
02-05-2026
Registration No
WP/5012/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMIT CHANDRAKANT GADEWAD MINOR THR FATHER CHANDRAKANT J GADEWAD
Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE KINWAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 5012/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide Sumit Chandrakant Gadewad's claim of belonging to the "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe, preferably within three months from May 5, 2026. The petitioner's claim had been pending since May 7, 2025, and the court accepted that he was willing to adopt the vigilance cell enquiry report already prepared for his cousin brother. The petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 5012/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to expeditiously decide Sumit Chandrakant Gadewad's claim of belonging to the "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe, preferably within three months from May 5, 2026. The petitioner's claim had been pending since May 7, 2025, and the court accepted that he was willing to adopt the vigilance cell enquiry report already prepared for his cousin brother. The petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts