SURESH RAGHOBA MALI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APPLN/1743/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030178282026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/4571/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1743/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH RAGHOBA MALI

    Adv. Chatterji Joydeep

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

    APPLN/1743/2026 Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed Suresh Raghoba Mali's application for suspension of sentence and bail following his conviction under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in a 2014 anti-corruption case. The court granted the relief primarily because his superior (the main accused) had already received identical relief, the appeal is pending with no near-term hearing prospects, and the sentence is limited to two years. Mali was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including six-monthly court appearances and prohibition on criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

APPLN/1743/2026 Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed Suresh Raghoba Mali's application for suspension of sentence and bail following his conviction under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in a 2014 anti-corruption case. The court granted the relief primarily because his superior (the main accused) had already received identical relief, the appeal is pending with no near-term hearing prospects, and the sentence is limited to two years. Mali was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including six-monthly court appearances and prohibition on criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case