Manohar Nagnath Dudhbhate NAGESH GURULING TALEKAR vs Mahesh Virbhadrappa Halge — CA/5504/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030177932026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/13215/2026

Filing Date

02-05-2026

Registration No

CA/5504/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Manohar Nagnath Dudhbhate NAGESH GURULING TALEKAR

Laxmi Manohar Dudhbhate

Respondent(s)

Mahesh Virbhadrappa Halge

Adv. COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV. MUKESH KAMALKISHOR GOYANKA FOR R/2,COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV. JAYDEEM S. KADAM FOR R/3 AND 4 1123

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Latur through the Branch Manager

Lalita Satish Dudhbhate

Samarth Satish Dudhbhate Under guardianship Mother Lalita Satish Dudhbhate

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

08-05-2026

URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' petition to withdraw court-deposited funds from an insurance award settlement. While respondents contested the application arguing doubtful evidence of motorcycle rider negligence, the court held the insurance company liable and permitted withdrawal of 75% of the applicants' share with accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' petition to withdraw court-deposited funds from an insurance award settlement. While respondents contested the application arguing doubtful evidence of motorcycle rider negligence, the court held the insurance company liable and permitted withdrawal of 75% of the applicants' share with accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case