Manohar Nagnath Dudhbhate NAGESH GURULING TALEKAR vs Mahesh Virbhadrappa Halge — CA/5504/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030177932026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/13215/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
CA/5504/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manohar Nagnath Dudhbhate NAGESH GURULING TALEKAR
-
2.Laxmi Manohar Dudhbhate
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh Virbhadrappa Halge
Adv. COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV. MUKESH KAMALKISHOR GOYANKA FOR R/2,COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV. JAYDEEM S. KADAM FOR R/3 AND 4 1123
-
2.The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Latur through the Branch Manager
-
3.Lalita Satish Dudhbhate
-
4.Samarth Satish Dudhbhate Under guardianship Mother Lalita Satish Dudhbhate
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' petition to withdraw court-deposited funds from an insurance award settlement. While respondents contested the application arguing doubtful evidence of motorcycle rider negligence, the court held the insurance company liable and permitted withdrawal of 75% of the applicants' share with accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Urgent Orders (Civil)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5504/2026
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' petition to withdraw court-deposited funds from an insurance award settlement. While respondents contested the application arguing doubtful evidence of motorcycle rider negligence, the court held the insurance company liable and permitted withdrawal of 75% of the applicants' share with accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts