THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR vs SHIVDAS NATTHU PATIL (DIED) LRS RAMESH NATTHU PATIL Advocate - Kale Ajeet B., R/SOLE SERVED — CA/8229/2011
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030177402011
Filing Number
CA/14339/2011
Filing Date
14-Jun-2011
Registration No
CA/8229/2011
Registration Date
12-Jul-2011
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Adv. Govt. Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVDAS NATTHU PATIL (DIED) LRS RAMESH NATTHU PATIL Advocate - Kale Ajeet B., R/SOLE SERVED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) allowed delay condonation applications and disposed of the State of Maharashtra's first appeals against land compensation awards from the Reference Court, Jalgaon. The court adopted the State's 2016 policy decision not to contest appeals where Reference Court awards fall within four times the SLAO amount. Related stay applications were dismissed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
30-Sep-2011
Due Orders- CIVIL
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Mridula Bhatkar
-
26-Aug-2011
For Orders [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Mridula Bhatkar
-
29-Jul-2011
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. BordeView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. CA/8229/2011
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) allowed delay condonation applications and disposed of the State of Maharashtra's first appeals against land compensation awards from the Reference Court, Jalgaon. The court adopted the State's 2016 policy decision not to contest appeals where Reference Court awards fall within four times the SLAO amount. Related stay applications were dismissed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts