TANAJI PANDIT SANAP vs VISHNU NAMDEO DARADE AND OTHERS — APPLN/1727/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030177322026

Filing Number

APPLN/4536/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1727/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANAJI PANDIT SANAP

    Adv. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU NAMDEO DARADE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ANKUSH VISHNU DARADE

  3. 3.LAHU VISHNU DARADE

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. COPY SERVED TO PP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: APPLN/1727/2026 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application of Vishnu Namdeo Darade and others. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the applicants to the wrongful restraint and abetment of suicide charges, including witness statements placing them with the deceased before his death, postmortem evidence of ante-mortem injuries, and phone records supporting harassment over debt repayment. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for effective investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1727/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPLN/1727/2026 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application of Vishnu Namdeo Darade and others. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the applicants to the wrongful restraint and abetment of suicide charges, including witness statements placing them with the deceased before his death, postmortem evidence of ante-mortem injuries, and phone records supporting harassment over debt repayment. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for effective investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case