MADHUKAR RUNJU MARATHE PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALGAON — CA/5343/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030176802026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/13147/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5343/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MADHUKAR RUNJU MARATHE PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALGAON
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO 1 UPPAR TAPI PROJECT HATNUR JALGAON
TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MIW DIVISION JALGAO
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted a "speaking to minutes" motion correcting its previous order dated 05.05.2026 in multiple consolidated land acquisition cases involving the Tapi Irrigation Project. The court added clarifications that were inadvertently omitted, permitting legal heirs of deceased claimants (Prakash Patil in FAST 12707/2025 and Dashrath Paradhi in FAST 4808/2025) to be substituted as parties and setting aside any abatement of their claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted a "speaking to minutes" motion correcting its previous order dated 05.05.2026 in multiple consolidated land acquisition cases involving the Tapi Irrigation Project. The court added clarifications that were inadvertently omitted, permitting legal heirs of deceased claimants (Prakash Patil in FAST 12707/2025 and Dashrath Paradhi in FAST 4808/2025) to be substituted as parties and setting aside any abatement of their claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts