Subhash Chindha Patil and others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP vs Tapi Trrigation Development Corporation, Jalgaon — CA/5351/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030176772026
e-Filing Number
16-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/13145/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5351/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Chindha Patil and others PANDE DIPESH DEELIP
Kailas Namdeo Mahajan
Adv. PANDE DIPESH DEELIP
Respondent(s)
Tapi Trrigation Development Corporation, Jalgaon
The State of Maharashtra
The Special Land Acquisition Officer 1
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted a "speaking to minutes" motion correcting its prior order dated 05.05.2026 by explicitly incorporating provisions to substitute deceased claimants with their legal heirs in two land acquisition cases. The court set aside any abatement and permitted heirs of deceased claimants Prakash Patil and Dashrath Paradhi to be brought on record as necessary parties, with the cause of action continuing against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted a "speaking to minutes" motion correcting its prior order dated 05.05.2026 by explicitly incorporating provisions to substitute deceased claimants with their legal heirs in two land acquisition cases. The court set aside any abatement and permitted heirs of deceased claimants Prakash Patil and Dashrath Paradhi to be brought on record as necessary parties, with the cause of action continuing against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts