JYOTI KANHAYALAL BASWE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5175/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: HCBM030176492026

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

WP/13122/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5175/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Category

CASTE CERTIFICATE ( 5 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

JYOTI KANHAYALAL BASWE

Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

02-07-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: WP 5175/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad (dated 07/05/2026) admitted the writ petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. As interim relief, the court restrained respondent No.3 from taking coercive action, conditioned on petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that no service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) will be claimed pending resolution of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 5175/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad (dated 07/05/2026) admitted the writ petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. As interim relief, the court restrained respondent No.3 from taking coercive action, conditioned on petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that no service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) will be claimed pending resolution of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case