NILESH RAVINDRA BASWE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5269/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: HCBM030176482026

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

WP/13121/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5269/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Category

CASTE CERTIFICATE ( 5 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

NILESH RAVINDRA BASWE

Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

02-07-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the writ petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. The court granted interim relief restraining respondent No.3 from taking coercive action on the impugned order, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation pending the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the writ petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026. The court granted interim relief restraining respondent No.3 from taking coercive action on the impugned order, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation pending the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Caste Claim - St All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case