RAMESH RUJU MARATHE RAMESH RUNZU MARATHE NAME AS PER ADHAR CARD PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CA/5324/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030176462026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/13120/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5324/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH RUJU MARATHE RAMESH RUNZU MARATHE NAME AS PER ADHAR CARD PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALGAON
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO 1 UPPAR TAPI PROJECT HATNUR JALGAON
TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MIW DIVISION JALGAO
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary of CA/5324/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a corrective order addressing an omission in its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court clarified that permissions to substitute deceased claimants with their legal heirs—which had been verbally granted—were inadvertently excluded from the written order. The court added this correction and set aside any abatement of proceedings, permitting heirs to be brought on record in land acquisition cases related to the Upper Tapi Project in Jalgaon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CA/5324/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a corrective order addressing an omission in its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court clarified that permissions to substitute deceased claimants with their legal heirs—which had been verbally granted—were inadvertently excluded from the written order. The court added this correction and set aside any abatement of proceedings, permitting heirs to be brought on record in land acquisition cases related to the Upper Tapi Project in Jalgaon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts