DANGAL MANSING PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THECOLLECTOR, JALGAON — CA/5274/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030176402026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/13116/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

CA/5274/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54

Petitioner(s)

DANGAL MANSING PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO

BHIKA DANGAL PATIL

PRAKASH DANGAL PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL

SUVARNA PRAKASH PATIL

DHIRAJ PRAKASH PATIL

VIJAY DANGAL PATIL

MIRABAI RAVINDRA MALI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THECOLLECTOR, JALGAON

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO 1 UPPAR TAPI PROJECT HATNUR JALGAON

TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MIW DIVISION JALGAO

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

05-05-2026

AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

CASE SUMMARY: CA/5274/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a "speaking to the minutes" order correcting its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court noted that prayers to bring legal heirs of deceased claimants on record—specifically in cases FAST.12707/2025 and FAST.4808/2025—were omitted from the original order despite being permitted during proceedings. The court added clarification that in FAST.12707/2025, claimant Prakash Patil's heirs are permitted to be substituted as parties with abatement set aside, and in FAST.4808/2025, claimant Dashrath Paradhi's heirs are permitted on record with abatement likewise set aside, recognizing the cause of action survives against the legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CA/5274/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a "speaking to the minutes" order correcting its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court noted that prayers to bring legal heirs of deceased claimants on record—specifically in cases FAST.12707/2025 and FAST.4808/2025—were omitted from the original order despite being permitted during proceedings. The court added clarification that in FAST.12707/2025, claimant Prakash Patil's heirs are permitted to be substituted as parties with abatement set aside, and in FAST.4808/2025, claimant Dashrath Paradhi's heirs are permitted on record with abatement likewise set aside, recognizing the cause of action survives against the legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case