DANGAL MANSING PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THECOLLECTOR, JALGAON — CA/5274/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030176402026

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/13116/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5274/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DANGAL MANSING PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO

  2. 2.BHIKA DANGAL PATIL

  3. 3.PRAKASH DANGAL PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI DANGAL PATIL

  4. 4.SUVARNA PRAKASH PATIL

  5. 5.DHIRAJ PRAKASH PATIL

  6. 6.VIJAY DANGAL PATIL

  7. 7.MIRABAI RAVINDRA MALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THECOLLECTOR, JALGAON

  2. 2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO 1 UPPAR TAPI PROJECT HATNUR JALGAON

  3. 3.TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MIW DIVISION JALGAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CA/5274/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a "speaking to the minutes" order correcting its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court noted that prayers to bring legal heirs of deceased claimants on record—specifically in cases FAST.12707/2025 and FAST.4808/2025—were omitted from the original order despite being permitted during proceedings. The court added clarification that in FAST.12707/2025, claimant Prakash Patil's heirs are permitted to be substituted as parties with abatement set aside, and in FAST.4808/2025, claimant Dashrath Paradhi's heirs are permitted on record with abatement likewise set aside, recognizing the cause of action survives against the legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  5. 05-May-2026

    At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CA/5274/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad issued a "speaking to the minutes" order correcting its previous judgment dated 05.05.2026. The court noted that prayers to bring legal heirs of deceased claimants on record—specifically in cases FAST.12707/2025 and FAST.4808/2025—were omitted from the original order despite being permitted during proceedings. The court added clarification that in FAST.12707/2025, claimant Prakash Patil's heirs are permitted to be substituted as parties with abatement set aside, and in FAST.4808/2025, claimant Dashrath Paradhi's heirs are permitted on record with abatement likewise set aside, recognizing the cause of action survives against the legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case