GOPAL DADA SONAWANE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/895/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030176322026

Filing Number

BA/4509/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/895/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 311, 189(2), 191(2)(3), 190, 115(2), 351(2), 118(2), 117(3(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL DADA SONAWANE AND OTHERS

    Adv. CHAUDHARI KRISHNA UDDHAV

  2. 2.KAILASH PREMARAJ MALCHE

  3. 3.RAHUL PANDIT MALCHE

  4. 4.SUKRAM NHARU BHIL

  5. 5.SAMADHAN ASHOK BHIL

  6. 6.LAXMAN SUKALAL BHIL

  7. 7.VIJAY JOTU BHIL

  8. 8.PARSHURAM SAKAHARAM MALCHE

  9. 9.GORAKH BABU BHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  3. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the bail application filed by Gopal Dada Sonawane and others as withdrawn, after the applicants sought permission to withdraw the application following the filing of a charge sheet during its pendency. The court granted liberty to the applicants to approach the Sessions Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  5. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the bail application filed by Gopal Dada Sonawane and others as withdrawn, after the applicants sought permission to withdraw the application following the filing of a charge sheet during its pendency. The court granted liberty to the applicants to approach the Sessions Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case