DEEPAK RAMESH CHOUDHARI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APEAL/316/2026

Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2),3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v). Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030176302026

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

APEAL/4507/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

APEAL/316/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2),3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,85,118,115,352,351

Petitioner(s)

DEEPAK RAMESH CHOUDHARI

Adv. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

07-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

30-06-2026
09-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Case Summary: APPEAL/316/2026 — Deepak Ramesh Choudhari v. The State of Maharashtra The case was adjourned due to paucity of time. The court directed that office objections be removed within two weeks, affidavits in reply be filed one week before the next hearing date, and spare copies be supplied within 14 days to process service of notice. The matter is listed for hearing on 30 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPEAL/316/2026 — Deepak Ramesh Choudhari v. The State of Maharashtra The case was adjourned due to paucity of time. The court directed that office objections be removed within two weeks, affidavits in reply be filed one week before the next hearing date, and spare copies be supplied within 14 days to process service of notice. The matter is listed for hearing on 30 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case