NARAYAN BAPURAO CHAVAL vs AMGOTHU SHRI RANGA NAIK Advocate - Govt. Pleader — CP/454/2016
Case under Project Affected Displaced Per.act 1976. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030176262016
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
CP/14201/2016
Filing Date
27-04-2016
Registration No
CP/454/2016
Registration Date
07-07-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARAYAN BAPURAO CHAVAL
Adv. Salunke Sudarshan J
Respondent(s)
AMGOTHU SHRI RANGA NAIK Advocate - Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-09-2016 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 13-07-2016 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 05-08-2016 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 02-09-2016 | FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 03-04-2020 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: CP/454/2016 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed a Civil Application permitting new applicants to be substituted as parties in place of the deceased original petitioner Narayan Bapurao Chaval (died 13.10.2018), condoning a 925-day delay. The court found no strong objection from the respondent and considered that a contempt order remained pending compliance. Amendments must be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: CP/454/2016 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed a Civil Application permitting new applicants to be substituted as parties in place of the deceased original petitioner Narayan Bapurao Chaval (died 13.10.2018), condoning a 925-day delay. The court found no strong objection from the respondent and considered that a contempt order remained pending compliance. Amendments must be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts