POOJA BANSILAL BASWE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5268/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: HCBM030176082026

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

WP/13095/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5268/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

POOJA BANSILAL BASWE

Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR DIVISION

THE GENERAL MANAGARER MAHARASHTRA GRAMIN BANK

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

02-07-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in Pooja Bansilal Baswe's writ petition challenging an order. Pending hearing, the court restrained respondent No.3 (Maharashtra Gramin Bank) from taking coercive action on condition that the petitioner files an undertaking within two weeks not to claim service benefits including promotion, increment, pay fixation, and confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in Pooja Bansilal Baswe's writ petition challenging an order. Pending hearing, the court restrained respondent No.3 (Maharashtra Gramin Bank) from taking coercive action on condition that the petitioner files an undertaking within two weeks not to claim service benefits including promotion, increment, pay fixation, and confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Caste Claim - St All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case