BHADRA SANKALP BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THR ITS PRESIDENT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4975/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030175982026
Filing Number
WP/13086/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
WP/4975/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHADRA SANKALP BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THR ITS PRESIDENT
Adv. KINGRE GAJANAN BHANUDAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT MADAM KAMA MARG
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PRIMARY
THE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary of WP/4975/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of three writ petitions filed by educational societies seeking fee reimbursement for 25% students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed the State of Maharashtra to independently scrutinize the petitioners' proposals on merit and issue a decision within 4 weeks; if eligible, reimbursement must be disbursed within an additional 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/4975/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of three writ petitions filed by educational societies seeking fee reimbursement for 25% students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed the State of Maharashtra to independently scrutinize the petitioners' proposals on merit and issue a decision within 4 weeks; if eligible, reimbursement must be disbursed within an additional 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts