SOMNATH KADUBA SAPKAL DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5209/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030175932026
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
WP/13081/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5209/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOMNATH KADUBA SAPKAL DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS
THE SCHEDULED TRIBES CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 02-07-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 5209/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in this writ petition by Somnath Kaduba Sapkal and others. Pending hearing, respondents 3 & 4 are restrained from taking coercive action, subject to petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits like promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 5209/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in this writ petition by Somnath Kaduba Sapkal and others. Pending hearing, respondents 3 & 4 are restrained from taking coercive action, subject to petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits like promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts