SOMNATH KADUBA SAPKAL DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5209/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030175932026
Filing Number
WP/13081/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5209/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOMNATH KADUBA SAPKAL DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBES CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
4.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5209/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in this writ petition by Somnath Kaduba Sapkal and others. Pending hearing, respondents 3 & 4 are restrained from taking coercive action, subject to petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits like promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5209/2026
Case Summary: WP 5209/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 02/07/2026 in this writ petition by Somnath Kaduba Sapkal and others. Pending hearing, respondents 3 & 4 are restrained from taking coercive action, subject to petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits like promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts