BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD THR ITS MANAGER MADHURI GABHUD vs SUBHASH RAMDHAN DHAKARE AND ORS — WP/5037/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030175832026

Filing Number

WP/13074/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5037/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD THR ITS MANAGER MADHURI GABHUD

    Adv. DESHMUKH MOHIT R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH RAMDHAN DHAKARE AND ORS

    Adv. SHIVAJI M NAWALE AND ASSOCIATES FOR R.NO. 01 1123

  2. 2.PATIL DHIRAJ M

  3. 3.RAJJAK KHAN JABBAR KHAN PATHAN

  4. 4.DADARAO KASHINATH RAUT

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    For Orders - Copies Not Supplied -CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    In WP/5037/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case. The petitioner was ordered to supply spare copies to serve respondents within two weeks; if complied, notice would be issued returnable in four weeks. Failure to supply copies within the stipulated period would result in automatic dismissal. Interim relief, if any, continues until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  6. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5037/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WP/5037/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case. The petitioner was ordered to supply spare copies to serve respondents within two weeks; if complied, notice would be issued returnable in four weeks. Failure to supply copies within the stipulated period would result in automatic dismissal. Interim relief, if any, continues until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case